Prediction of Mark Cox vs Ferdi Taygan Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cox vs F. Taygan

Mark Cox

GBR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ferdi Taygan

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Cox 1 - 1 Taygan

They have played 5 sets in total, with Mark Cox winning 2 and Ferdi Taygan winning 3. The last match between Mark Cox and Ferdi Taygan was at the Surbiton, 18-06-1979, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Mark Cox getting the victory 6-7 6-2 10-8.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Cox	1
Taygan	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Surbiton(06-18-79)

Stats

Mark Cox

Ferdi Taygan

(R2) Queens Club(06-11-79)

Stats

Ferdi Taygan

Mark Cox

M. Cox vs F. Taygan H2H Profile

M. Cox	Stats	F. Taygan
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
59.71% (412-278)	Career Total W/L	39.62% (84-128)
1	Grass	1
14	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Cox vs F. Taygan Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mark Cox has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ferdi Taygan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mark Cox, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ferdi Taygan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mark Cox has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferdi Taygan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mark Cox has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ferdi Taygan winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mark Cox has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 67/43), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 14/12). Ferdi Taygan has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 61% (W/L 4/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 15/37).
Player level: In the last year, Mark Cox has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ferdi Taygan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mark Cox winning 1 times and Ferdi Taygan being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mark Cox winning 2 and Ferdi Taygan winning 3.
The last match between Mark Cox and Ferdi Taygan was at the Surbiton, 18-06-1979, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Mark Cox getting the victory 6-7 6-2 10-8.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mark Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ferdi Taygan has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mark Cox has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferdi Taygan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mark Cox has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferdi Taygan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mark Cox vs Ferdi Taygan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Cox vs F. Taygan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Cox	Stats	F. Taygan
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
28	Games Won	29
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Cox Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Paris Indoor - 26-10-1981
R3 Yannick NoahY. Noah	L	6-2 5-7 6-2	Stats
Stuttgart Outdoor - 13-07-1981
R3 Warren MaherW. Maher	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Wimbledon - 22-06-1981
R1 Carlos KirmayrC. Kirmayr	L	6-3 6-7 6-4 6-4	Stats
Queens Club - 08-06-1981
R2 Syd BallS. Ball	L	7-6 6-2	Stats
Chitchester CH - 04-05-1981
R3 Raymond MooreR. Moore	L	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

F. Taygan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney Indoor - 10-10-1983
R3 Fritz BuehningF. Buehning	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Australian Open - 02-12-1982
R1 Tim WilkisonT. Wilkison	L	6-1 7-6 6-1	Stats
Stockholm - 01-11-1982
R2 Ilie NastaseI. Nastase	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 18-10-1982
R2 Pat DupreP. Dupre	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
North Conway - 26-07-1982
R2 Fernando LunaF. Luna	L	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

M. Cox vs F. Taygan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Cox	Stats	F. Taygan
59.71% (412/278)	YTD Win/Loss	39.61% (82/125)
56.94% (1017/769)	Sets Win/Loss	42.77% (210/281)
52.53% (9232/8343)	Games Win/Loss	46.75% (2117/2411)
59.90% (124/83)	Hard Win/Loss	38.46% (25/40)
58.75% (94/66)	Clay Win/Loss	28.85% (15/37)
60.43% (113/74)	Indoor Hard W/L	46.67% (28/32)
60.91% (67/43)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (10/15)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
483.49	Average Opponent Rank	589.85
59.38% (38/26)	Slam W/L	28.57% (6/15)
59.26% (16/11)	Masters W/L	33.33% (3/6)
68.42% (13/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
59.59% (345/234)	Main Tour W/L	39.39% (65/100)
0.00% (0/1)	Challenger W/L	66.67% (8/4)
60% (325/544)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (75/183)
59% (82/139)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	32% (6/19)
44% (14/32)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
57% (118/206)	Deciding Set Win %	38% (22/58)
86% (391/338)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (91/69)
14% (391/53)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (91/22)
24% (295/70)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (113/12)